On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:58:38PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (16/09/16 12:52), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:34:26PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >> Howdy!
> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek(a)redhat.com>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > fedorahosted.org
is being decomissioned:
> >> >
> >> > so we need to find a new home for SSSD..
> >> >
> >> > I wanted to ask:
> >> > 1) anyone from the core development team who is interested in
> >> > finding a new home to raise a hand, we need someone to
> >> > work
> >> > 2) anyone from outside or inside the team who has an opinion to
> >> > voice it :) so far we haven't even thought about the
> >> > in too much detail, though..
> >> >
> >> > In the meantime I just wrote up what fields we use from Trac and
> >> > therefore what info we need to keep in the new system:
> >> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/ticket_fields
> >> So, I've seen that both pagure and github have pretty much the same
> >> "issues" system and, AFAIR, it doesn't fit as well.
> >> Considering Pavel's suggestion (something self-hosted), why not
> >> Phabricator? Phabricator's trac seems to fit pretty much what we need.
> >I've also heard good things about Phabricator (except being written in
> I do not really mind which language was used; if I do not need to administrate
> >but IMO we shouldn't host our own project tracker, we just don't
> >have the manpower..
> Maybe fedora-infra would be interested in hosting Phabricator.
> It might be good to combine Phabricator + Pagure. The question
> is whether they would be interested in hosting hosting another service
> if they decide to get rid of servidces in fedorahosted
> BTW the deadline is on 2017-02-28. So we still have time to persuade
> them to either improve pagure issues tracker or to deply something else
> (e.g. Phabricator)
I asked explicitly if there is an option of hosting something like
gitlab or phabricator..