On 07/29/2011 03:25 PM, John Hodrien wrote:
> > I'm thinking sssd likely to crawl into a hole at some
point anyway, but the
> > caching's a whole lot more sane, so I'm hoping it'll plod along
more
> > successfully than nss_ldap/nscd.
Just for kicks and giggles I pointed it at the entire tree (rather than the
normal subset I use), and ran 'id myusername'.
First call:
real 3m45.453s
182M cache_default.ldb
This should be much faster once 1.6.0 is out (next week, hopefully),
because we'll be using the ASQ dereferencing control[1] rather than
sequentially requesting all group members.
[1]
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa746418%28v=vs.85%29.aspx