On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:39:03PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 01/07/2015 12:00 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:02:39AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
>>On 01/06/2015 11:10 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>>On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 02:26:22PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
>>>>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/DBusResponder
>>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>I have take the following tikcet that is about implementing D-Bus calls
for
>>>>domains, users and groups. I have some questions.
>>>>
>>>>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2150
>>>>
>>>>*List and Find methods interface*
>>>>At this moment we implement all List* and Find* methods on
>>>>/org/freedesktop/sssd/infopipe and org.freedesktop.sssd.infopipe
interface.
>>>>
>>>>The patches I sent today enables having support for different interfaces
on
>>>>/path and /path/*, therefore we can implement the methods as:
>>>>
>>>>/infopipe/Users infopipe.Users.ListUsers()
>>>>/infopipe/Users/$UID user specific methods and properties
>>>>
>>>>instead of:
>>>>/infopipe infopipe.ListUsers()
>>>>/infopipe/Users/$UID user specific methods and properties
>>>>
>>>>I think it make sense. Is this something we want?
>>>
>>>Yes, I like this suggestion better, too.
>>
>>Do we agree on the following interface schema? Or do you have other
>>suggestions?
>>
>>/ifp/Users ifp.Users
>>/ifp/Users/* ifp.Users.User
>>
>>Methods will drop 'Users' keyword. I.e. ifp.Users.List() instead of
>>ifp.Users.ListUsers().
>>
>>I though about ifp.User for the subtree but I don't really like when
>>interface name differs only in the ending 's'. That is quite error prone
to
>>me.
>
>What about changing infopipe to ifp? Or is that a typo?
I just wanted to shorten the name for the purpose of this conversation and
avoid writing the whole org.freedesktop.sssd.infopipe. Sorry, I thought its
obvious.
OK, then I agree with your proposal.