On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:00:26AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Shall we push this patch to master since it looks correct code wise and
doesn't look like it should regress anything or shall we wait for more
complete solution in 1.14 that would also address domain-vs-realm
concerns?
Is there a risk that the domain-vs-realm solution will cause us want
to revert this change? My feeling is it won't, so I'd vote for getting
it in master now.
Of course, the domain-vs-realm work can cause the codepaths that
populate the value to change but the value and its semantics is likely
to stay.
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat