1 Sep
2015
1 Sep
'15
10:06 a.m.
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:00:26AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Shall we push this patch to master since it looks correct code wise and doesn't look like it should regress anything or shall we wait for more complete solution in 1.14 that would also address domain-vs-realm concerns?
Is there a risk that the domain-vs-realm solution will cause us want to revert this change? My feeling is it won't, so I'd vote for getting it in master now.
Of course, the domain-vs-realm work can cause the codepaths that populate the value to change but the value and its semantics is likely to stay.
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat