On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:21:55AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 14:16 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> When I limited the maximum key length to NAME_MAX I forgot about
> indirect keys. Ian Kent reminded me in
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683523#c80 that indirect
> keys can be full paths.
Ack
I lied in the comment, it's direct keys, not indirect. The code is the
same as the first patch.