On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:22:13AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
on (13/08/14 17:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 04:13:52PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >Thanks, that's a very helpful explanation. Then I propose we:
>> > 1) revert the patch
>> > 2) for downstream, add some documentation that certain openldap
>> > servers are broken and if you use those, you need to disable
>> > dereference
>> >
>> >Sounds like a plan?
>> Agree.
>
>Thanks for the explanation.
>
>OK, can you send the revert so I can ack it and push it? The explanation
>might do for a nice commit message.
>
Is description in attached patch clear or sufficient?
LS
It is both clear and sufficient to me.
Thank you. ACK.