On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:49:12PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (30/03/14 22:31), Dmitri Pal wrote:
>I ran the tests again, did distcheck and verified valgrind.
>Everything seems OK.
>
>Refined patches attached.
>
>--
>Thank you,
>Dmitri Pal
>
>Sr. Engineering Manager for IdM portfolio
>Red Hat Inc.
>
>
>-------------------------------
>Looking to carve out IT costs?
>www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
>
After long discussion.
>From 6c60bb721f1f5b5498b753eaa499594ed943961b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Dmitri Pal <dpal(a)redhat.com>
>Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 19:00:57 -0500
>Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [INI] New entry to read data from mem
>
ACK
>From 3d043220b76d41441b1e2fc5378c05fe2d61bbe3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Dmitri Pal <dpal(a)redhat.com>
>Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 19:02:29 -0500
>Subject: [PATCH 2/3] [INI] Prevent tight loop
>
ACK
>From 3b83e7c3473d705920aedaeb6cba7ec47b0ac3a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Dmitri Pal <dpal(a)redhat.com>
>Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 22:20:29 -0400
>Subject: [PATCH 3/3] [INI] Unit test for the new interface
>
ACK
Pushed to master:
1c65fc1a9b585fca62e35d09ae6aaf750a566e75
ffcd1c1e980ee2b05c63615335966a1fd2089051
8adcc6605c517402b6e31c3ca02410cbd701ce84
I will prepare patches for bumping version-info (on Tuesday/Wednesday)
and we can release new version. Any objections?
No objections, but are you also planning on including the patch with
subject "[PATCH] AUTOMAKE: Do not treat warnings as errors" ?