On 01/10/2012 10:17 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 10:49 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> I also have one cosmetic proposal for patch #0009:
>
> 1) On line 452 use MC_ALIGN64 instead of (n_elem + 7) & (~7)
The reason I did not use MC_ALIGN64 is that I thought it would be
confusing as n_elem is not a pointer but a counter.
I'll change the code and add more explanation on why using MC_ALIGN64 is
ok there.
Simo.
As there any SELinux implication with this feature?
--
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal
Sr. Engineering Manager IPA project,
Red Hat Inc.
-------------------------------
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/