On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:15:45PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (03/12/14 21:44), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>On 12/03/2014 07:23 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (03/12/14 18:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>>On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:18:33AM -0500, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>From: "Nikolai Kondrashov"
<Nikolai.Kondrashov(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>To: "Development of the System Security Services Daemon"
<sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>
>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 4:00:14 PM
>>>>>Subject: Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] CI: Update valgrind suppresion database
for libselinux
>>>>>
>>>>>On 12/03/2014 04:23 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>>>> From 7f041a011f44a8fb1c128095ad55c0669287209d Mon Sep 17
00:00:00 2001
>>>>>>From: Lukas Slebodnik<lslebodn(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 14:34:43 +0100
>>>>>>Subject: [PATCH 1/2] CI: Update valgrind suppresion database for
libselinux
>>>>>>
>>>>>>problem is already fixed in fedora >= 21
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks, Lukas!
>>>>>Do you have any information on what the problem was?
>>>>>
>>>>I'm sorry it isn't important information for me.
>>>>Problem is fixed on fedora 21. And that's al what I need to know.
>>>>
>>>>LS
>>>
>>>Can you change the name as Nikolai requested so that we can push the
>>>patch and unbreak CI?
>>I do not see a reason why there should be prefix sssd-
>>
>>The problem is in libselinux and not in sssd.
>
>Yes, but this way we'll also be able to see that it is *our* suppression and
>not some other package suppression from /usr/lib64/valgrind.
>
valgrind will not use prefix "libselinux-"
I really don't want to spend more time on naming of a valgrind
suppresion. I think I, and I hope other developers too, have more
important things to do.
If the patch solves the problem, then fine.