On 09/22/2015 10:25 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 09/21/2015 04:33 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> Hello, please see simple patch attached.
Hi,
the patch looks good in general. However, I'd like to rephrase the warning.
> + "%s is lesser then %s, sysdb will not be updated for
users.\n",
^lower
How about:
%s is lower then %s. User records will not be updated before memory cache entry expires.
%s is lower then %s. User records will not be updated before memory cache entry gets
expired.
_______________________________________________
Hello Pavel, thanks for comment. I updated the patch as you proposed.
I did quick research on usage of smaller/lower/lesser and all seem to for correct for our
case, but I agree that lower might sound more common.