On 11/19/2012 02:38 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 14:13 +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> SSSDBG_CRITICAL_FAILURE or SSSDBG_FATAL_FAILURE
It seem that you are expanding the set of errors printed when no debug
level is set.
Before it was just the old level 0, now it's the old level 0 and 1.
Why ?
Simo.
No. When global variable debug_level was set to SSSDBG_UNRESOLVED (this
is temporary state) we printed no debug messages. This caused some
information to be lost during initialization when running as daemon (not
with -i). So I decided to print both fatal and critical messages during
this temporary state (originally I was thinking about printing
everything during this state, but that was too verbose).
Thanks
Michal