On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 04:23:12PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 21:36 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:21:17AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > Given that Lukas says "http_parser can provide pkgconfig in future",
> > read his mail as a preference to keep the pkg-check test. And actually I
> > agree, it doesn't hurt, let's keep it in.
> I wanted to push these patches:
> but..I can't find http_parser_strict on Debian, only http-parser and the
> patches seem to require the _strict version. I really don't know the
> difference between the two, can we fallback to the non-strict?
If it not too hard to detect if strict is present I would try to use it
and fallback to not strict only of not available.
Thanks, I will prepare a fallback patch. I agree about the preference,
but was wondering if we should require strict or not.