On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:55:26PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
Dne 23.1.2012 15:39, Jakub Hrozek napsal(a):
>On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:23:36AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
>>Dne 23.1.2012 02:24, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
>>>Also, when you call sss_dp_issue_request(), you're passing
'state' as
>>>the pvt data for sss_dp_get_sudoers_msg(), but you meant to pass
'info',
>>>I think.
>>
>>Shouldn't we start using tallog_get_type_abort() to detect these situations?
>>
>
>I'm not sure we should ever abort, except for situations like options
>mismatch (those can be potentially very dangerous).
We can set up our own 'abort' function using talloc_set_abort_fn().
For example: we can create an abort function that would kill sssd if
it is under development but prints DEBUG messages in users version.
I like this idea if we can get around the requirement of having to
support an old talloc version.
This function is not yet documented.
You can send a patch to man talloc :-)