On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 02:01:52PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:31:05PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>I don't think you rephrasing is correct. What I'm trying to say is:
> >>
> >>There are two meta server status:
> >>- port status (A)
> >>- srv lookup status (B)
> >>
> >>1. srv lookup fails, setting B to "resolve error" and A to
"not
> >>working", sssd goes offline
> >>2. sssd tries to go back online, setting A to "neutral"
> >>3. it tries to resolve meta server, but B is "resolve error" since
we
> >>haven't reached the timeout to set B to "neutral" as well
> >>4. resolving meta server fails, but we don't continue with the next
server
> >>
> >>I believe my explanation is correct but it maybe needs more words for
> >>those who did not dig in the code. Should I use more verbose explanation
> >>similar to the one above?
> >
> >Yes please.
> >
> >Simo.
> >
>
> Hope this is clear now.
>
Simo acked the commit message on IRC.
* master - 5490fa3ea4f6a4118a5188acb0e05daa302ed9d6
* sssd-1-11 - 8b0aeee7fe668d8863699d942519a0ac51304049