On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:14:57AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:00:06PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/06/16 15:13), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:11:49PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:42:56PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 04:32:20PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >> > > > oops, yes I guess this would be a good idea. I'll send a
new patch.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > new version attached.
> >> > >
> >> > > bye,
> >> > > Sumit
> >> >
> >> > One last question, do we want to add the ocsp_default_responder and
> >> > ocsp_default_responder_signing_cert options to configAPI?
> >>
> >> No, because I think the configAPI is currently not capable of this
> >> because both are only allowed options to certificate_verification as
> >> e.g. no_ocsp or no_verification.
> >
> >OK, makes sense.
> >
> >Thank you, ACK.
> master:
> * 53ef8f81b60929a6c866efdd133627e7d7d61705
> * aa35995ef056aa8ae052a47c62c6750b7adf065e
> * 875c90d531e6869a92da4b515db729ffce7c4244
>
> LS
I would like to backport these patches to sssd-1-13, because without
them, the patches for upstream #2977 do not apply cleanly and I think
it's better to apply more upstream patches than to backport and fork.
fine by me, shall I send patches for sssd-1-13 or will you do the
backport of the three patches?
bye,
Sumit
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org