On (09/12/15 14:29), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:15:32PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (09/12/15 14:11), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (09/12/15 13:21), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 12:24:38PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> see the attached trivial patch. It was verified by a user on IRC that
> >>> decreasing the timeout helped quite a bit when a laptop with AD user
> >>> went offline and the AD user tried to unlock the screen.
> >>
> >>ACK (waiting for CI to finish ...)
> >>
> >http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/34/28/summary.html
> >
> >rawhide fail is unrelated.
> >
> >new libtool is already in koji
>
>http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/34/28/fedora_rawhide/ci-build-debug/ci-mock-build.log
> >
> master:
> * a687f4473bf305bc2ccb075cd93154c9d661b638
>
> BTW should it be fixed also in stable branch?
> At least this patch was trivial. if we do not push other patches
> for ticket #2866
I would only push this patch into the stable branch if the patch for
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2866 is pushed.
I think we should use correct search timeouts and patch is safe.
sssd-1-13:
* e4231dff16f7b6ff9ef68718a67ea01cec62bab6
sssd-1-12:
* fe022b2c87c82693d24f6abc90e36ad8c11c34ca
LS