On (14/06/14 12:06), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 06/14/2014 11:55 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (14/06/14 10:47), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>On 06/14/2014 12:56 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>On (13/06/14 23:26), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>>>On 06/13/2014 10:28 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>Let's summarize.
>>
>>Sure, it was satisfying deleting that much quotation :)
>>
>>>I don't like maintaing build dependecies in two different palaces
>>>and you don't want to extract build dependencies from spec file.
>>>We need to find a compromise. What do you propose?
>>
>>Can we agree on an acceptable level of dependency syncing, past initial
>>development?
>>
>>Let's say, once we see four commits to contrib/ci/deps.sh related to Red Hat
>>distro dependencies in a month, we'll switch to pulling them from the .spec
>>file.
>If you consider rhel6 then it is not a compromise. It is a duplication
>of maintaining conditional build dependencies for different platforms
>(rhel6, fedora) in two different places. It is not a simplification
>and purpose of CI should be to simplify developers workflow.
I'm sorry, but that's my offer for now.
It's not a compromise, unless both of the sides yield their position at least
a little. I think I did yield mine, what's your offer :)?
Current version of script is unusable for rhel6.
I will accept compromise if we want to test sssd master branch on rhel >= 7.
LS