On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 04/29/2014 03:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>we've been keeping the sssd-1-11 branch fairly conservative recently,
>mostly as a precaution to not break downstreams that consume sssd-1-11,
>like RHEL.
>
>But some relatively larger features, such as the InfoPipe responder,
>need to be backported to sssd-1-11 (and by extension to RHEL-6) now. One
>large difference between master and sssd-1-11 are the DEBUG messages and
>I'd like to propose that we backport the new DEBUG messages to sssd-1-11
>and mass-convert the callers the same way we did in master.
>
>I think backporting the DEBUG messages change would be relatively
>low-risk, as the messages don't generally affect the behaviour of the
>daemon.
>
>The big downside of course is that we break git-blame and cause a bit of
>churn in sssd-1-11. But I think this downside it outweighted by not
>having to backport each and every DEBUG message from patches we'll be
>pulling in from master to sssd-1-11, which is all the SBUS changes Stef
>did recently and also all the work on the IFP responder.
>
>The next step would be backporting the SBUS changes, but I'd prefer a
>separate thread about those.
>
>Thoughts?
+1
+1
bye,
Sumit
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel