On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 06/02/2010 10:37 AM, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
>
> Actually, I am using: rpm-4.6.1-3.fc10. It properly added a dep on
> libsemanage.so.6, but I thought a new dependency should be explicit vs
> implicit sort of like the zen of python. Perhaps I was wrong in
> thinking this but it is a bit annoying to not see a dep like that when
> staring at the spec file. No worries either way as this patch is very
> trivial.
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
Ah. Well in that case, I rescind the original patch unless you think
it will be necessary for RHEL or some older version of rpm.
--
Jeff Schroeder
Don't drink and derive, alcohol and analysis don't mix.
http://www.digitalprognosis.com