Hi,
yes exactly. It's in password-auth
thanks,
a.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com>wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 11:28 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:20:01AM +0200, Aziz Sasmaz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I resolved cert issue. But there is one more thing I wonder. The
> > configuration I use for system-auth in redhat 5.7 does not work for
> > Centos 6.2 In 6.2 it without pam_sss it works. How does it happen
if
> > there is no sssd pam module in system-auth. I am also sure the
> > authentication is made through sssd
> > For instance i use the below configuration on 5.7;
> > # User changes will be destroyed the next time authconfig is run.
> > auth required pam_env.so
> > auth sufficient pam_unix.so nullok try_first_pass
> > auth requisite pam_succeed_if.so uid >= 500 quiet
> > auth sufficient pam_sss.so use_first_pass
> > auth required pam_deny.so
> > account required pam_unix.so
> > account sufficient pam_succeed_if.so uid < 500 quiet
> > account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_sss.so
> > account required pam_permit.so
> > password requisite pam_cracklib.so try_first_pass retry=3
> > #password required pam_passwdqc.so enforce=users
> > min=disabled,16,12,8,6
> > password sufficient pam_unix.so md5 shadow nullok
try_first_pass
> > use_authtok
> > password sufficient pam_sss.so use_authtok
> > password required pam_deny.so
> > session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke
> > session required pam_limits.so
> > session optional pam_mkhomedir.so skel=/etc/skel/
umask=0022
> > session [success=1 default=ignore] pam_succeed_if.so service in
crond
> > quiet use_uid
> > session required pam_unix.so
> > session sufficient pam_sss.so
> > But in 6.2 below configuration works without pam_sss. there are
only ldap
> > pam modules. But I checked the authentication is made through sssd.
> > auth required pam_env.so
> > auth sufficient pam_fprintd.so
> > auth sufficient pam_unix.so nullok try_first_pass
> > auth requisite pam_succeed_if.so uid >= 500 quiet
> > auth sufficient pam_ldap.so use_first_pass
> > auth required pam_deny.so
> > account required pam_unix.so broken_shadow
> > account sufficient pam_localuser.so
> > account sufficient pam_succeed_if.so uid < 500 quiet
> > account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_ldap.so
> > account required pam_permit.so
> > password requisite pam_cracklib.so try_first_pass retry=3
type=
> > password sufficient pam_unix.so sha512 shadow nullok
try_first_pass
> > use_authtok
> > password sufficient pam_ldap.so use_authtok
> > password required pam_deny.so
> > session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke
> > session required pam_limits.so
> > session optional pam_oddjob_mkhomedir.so skel=/etc/skel/
> > umask=0022
> > session [success=1 default=ignore] pam_succeed_if.so service in
crond
> > quiet use_uid
> > session required pam_unix.so
> > session optional pam_ldap.so
> >
>
> I very much doubt it, the pam_sss.so module is the entry point for
> SSSD's pam responder. When logging in, can you check what does
> /var/log/secure say? If the login goes through sssd, you should see
> pam_sss being mentioned, like this:
>
> sshd[16406]: pam_sss(sshd:auth): authentication success; logname= uid=0
> euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=localhost.localdomain user=admin
>
> Also can you check that the service you are logging in with uses the PAM
> config file you posted?
Aziz, in RHEL 6.2, GDM and SSHD no longer use /etc/pam.d/system-auth for
their PAM stack. Instead, they use /etc/pam.d/password-auth. I'm betting
you have pam_sss.so set up in password-auth.
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel