On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Jakub Hrozek
<jhrozek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 04:08:03PM +0200, Fabiano FidĂȘncio wrote:
>> So, sorry for the very long title and please, see the proposed patches
>> for solving
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3094
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> --
>> Fabiano FidĂȘncio
>
>> From 7b04832fce0bdf7f8e86c30f60811f7d219e62fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabiano=20Fid=C3=AAncio?= <fidencio(a)redhat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:04:51 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] RESPONDERS: Decrease debug level for failures in
>
> ACK
>
>> From ac7d4a7e6dfaf5d6c08419452b36937ac01453be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabiano=20Fid=C3=AAncio?= <fidencio(a)redhat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:08:09 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] RESPONDERS: Show a bit more info in case of
>
> ACK
>
>> From 8d595daa03b2a8af1605744cd19d5000a9546456 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabiano=20Fid=C3=AAncio?= <fidencio(a)redhat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:12:45 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] RESPONDERS: Pass errno to strerror() when
>> SELINUX_getpeercon() fails
>
> I would prefer:
> ret = errno;
> strerror(ret)
>
> in case we ever added another IO operation into the block which might
> reset errno.