On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 15:20 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On 07/29/2011 08:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > >> Considering that it may be a lot of work to regroup the patches, I
> > >> think
> > >>
> > >> > it may be even better to have squash 40-43 and 44-46 together,
but
> > >> > a patch that does not compile seems bad to me.
> > >
> > > This sounds reasonable. Should I do the job and send them back or
> > > were you thinking about squashing them during the push?
> >
> > Can you squash them the next time you rebase & resend to keep up with
> > the current master?
>
> Sure thing
Jan, please do this rebase and I'll get these changes pushed.
Rebase done, sending patches in attachment. Jakub suggested to split the
patches per function, but this is too much effort and I think it's not worth
it. Therefore I stick with the original idea to squash patches related to each
other.
Jan