lør, 13.11.2004 kl. 17.56 skrev seth vidal:
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 16:51 +0100, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote:
> fre, 12.11.2004 kl. 21.00 skrev seth vidal:
> > > No but you might find that some words are found "unprofessional"
for 95%
> > > of the userbase - even if they personally don't care.
> >
> > What if I happen to be in the world's oldest profession?
> >
>
> You are not. Unless the physics dept. at duke is something else than i
> might believe.
>
> > I think you're generalizing overly much and making far too sweeping
> > assumptions about mores and values.
> >
> > -sv
>
> I might. But who will miss it?
I will.
you know how to use yum to get them :P
> It is a reason Apple and even M$ don't ship screensavers with words that
> might be misunderstood.
I thought it was b/c they weren't nearly as interesting.
Do a nice screensaver need to contain anything that might get misjugded?
But can we *please* stop this war? It is getting mor stupid by each
post. No-body is suggesting to remove everything funny (such as what
should happen to anybody configuring gdm to run as root, according to
the gdmsetup help file), but simply:
-removing screensavers containing words which can be misjudged
-splitting the screensaver rpm into a "fit for you grandma's computer"-
and a "needs hw GL"- package - so that you could kill the last one
easily.