fre, 12.11.2004 kl. 16.45 skrev seth vidal:
> I understand your point (and i have no problems with it
*myself*), but
> if my manager came to me complaining about "hey! That new Linux-thingy,
> you installed, it popped up "penis" on my projector, while i was
> presenting our might-be new customers a new product!" and i never even
> had thought of the posibility - i would have been bloody damn embarassed
> and angry.
>
So you're kowtowing to a purely hypothetical, corporate, prurient
interest?
No, i am not. On my *personal* desktop i would not have any problem with
porn pictures being the default screensaver (unless my mother saw it...)
- as i know how to find the screensaver control dialog. I would just
find it stupid, childish, and generally looking like something two
teenage boys had programmed at night.
We don't want Linux/RH/Fedora/etc to look like something programmed by
two High School students, we want it to look like the rock solid,
professional piece of software it *IS*. Something that just does what it
should do, and nothing else. Something you can thrust.
I don't want a distribution I work on censored b/c someone is
afraid
their screensaver might offend a customer.
If people are concerned about 'decency' in certain packages then let
them add a distribution-nanny package that cleans these things up.
yum install frightened_of_naughty_words.noarch
or "yum install naugty_words"
Kyrre.