On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 16:40 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Many of the WG members have probably seen this in an early draft
form. I'd like to see if WG members could check over it again and at
least indicate here on list if they're generally in agreement with
it,
so we can start to discuss it with the Council and identify where
they
might have suggestions. We wouldn't want to do that without some
consensus that the WG as a whole is good with it.
+1 from me
Please fix the duplication of the Principles section ("While the
inclusion process is one of procurement")