On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 01:50 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 20:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> 'DE core functionality' sounds vague. At this point it might be more
> honest to give up the term 'critical path' and just say that everything
> on the desktop live image is considered 'important'.
This isn't a replacement for the 'critical path', that will still exist
as a separate concept which is used for other purposes, and it has its
own clear definition. This is a new definition of an 'important' package
set, which will be used for this updates testing purpose.
Ah, ok. That makes more sense. But still, 'whats on the live cd' seems
like a reasonable approximation to repoclosure(core desktop + important
apps).