On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 23:31 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 01:50 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 20:19 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > 'DE core functionality' sounds vague. At this point it might be more
> > honest to give up the term 'critical path' and just say that
> > on the desktop live image is considered 'important'.
> This isn't a replacement for the 'critical path', that will still exist
> as a separate concept which is used for other purposes, and it has its
> own clear definition. This is a new definition of an 'important' package
> set, which will be used for this updates testing purpose.
Ah, ok. That makes more sense. But still, 'whats on the live cd' seems
like a reasonable approximation to repoclosure(core desktop + important
I agree that the proposed wording is pretty vague, indeed, and should be
much more precise. Perhaps ask Bill about this?
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org