Hello,
there is simple patch attached. Please, look at commit message.
Regards
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:22:10AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
bump
obvious ACK, just waiting for the CI to finish.
bye, Sumit
-- Petr^4 Čech _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:38:43AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:22:10AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
bump
obvious ACK, just waiting for the CI to finish.
There are 2 failures in http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/44/38/summary.html but they look like CI issues and not related to the patch.
ACK
bye, Sumit
bye, Sumit
-- Petr^4 Čech _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
On (03/06/16 13:09), Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:38:43AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:22:10AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
bump
obvious ACK, just waiting for the CI to finish.
There are 2 failures in http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/44/38/summary.html but they look like CI issues and not related to the patch.
ACK
master: * 9a6ff0851fc707f21165818f66ae926fa14d7226
LS
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Lukas Slebodnik lslebodn@redhat.com wrote:
On (03/06/16 09:38), Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:22:10AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
bump
obvious ACK, just waiting for the CI to finish.
It might be a good idea to enable some compiler warning to catch such issues.
Using manywarnings.m4 is something desirable, I guess. https://github.com/coreutils/gnulib/blob/master/m4/manywarnings.m4
LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Best Regards,
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:38:01PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Lukas Slebodnik lslebodn@redhat.com wrote:
On (03/06/16 09:38), Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:22:10AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
bump
obvious ACK, just waiting for the CI to finish.
It might be a good idea to enable some compiler warning to catch such issues.
Using manywarnings.m4 is something desirable, I guess. https://github.com/coreutils/gnulib/blob/master/m4/manywarnings.m4
Did you try compiling sssd with these additional warnigns? I wonder how many turn up and if there would be too many false positives to fix..
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Jakub Hrozek jhrozek@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:38:01PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Lukas Slebodnik lslebodn@redhat.com wrote:
On (03/06/16 09:38), Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:22:10AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
bump
obvious ACK, just waiting for the CI to finish.
It might be a good idea to enable some compiler warning to catch such issues.
Using manywarnings.m4 is something desirable, I guess. https://github.com/coreutils/gnulib/blob/master/m4/manywarnings.m4
Did you try compiling sssd with these additional warnigns? I wonder how many turn up and if there would be too many false positives to fix..
I didn't. But I'll put it in my (not-so-short-term) TODO list..
IMO we can get rid of setting the warnings manually and start taking advantage of the warnings.m4 and manywarnings.m4 gnulib's files.
About the possible false positives, we can have a list of "dontwarn" warnings, just excluding the non-interesting/false positive warnings, as we do in spice-gtk/libosinfo.
Of course, this idea shouldn't block this patch, it's just an idea for the future :-)
Best Regards,
On (03/06/16 14:38), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Lukas Slebodnik lslebodn@redhat.com wrote:
On (03/06/16 09:38), Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:22:10AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
bump
obvious ACK, just waiting for the CI to finish.
It might be a good idea to enable some compiler warning to catch such issues.
Using manywarnings.m4 is something desirable, I guess. https://github.com/coreutils/gnulib/blob/master/m4/manywarnings.m4
By default is sssd build with following flags https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/sssd.git/tree/Makefile.am#n95
sssd can be also built with following extra flags ./configure CFLAGS="-Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare".
I would welcome any additional warnings. I didn't check which of warnings from manywarnings.m4 are enabled by default with Wextra or Wall but I know that some compiler warnings are not part of this "group" flags.
I am all five for enabling new warnigns.
LS
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 04:55:15PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (03/06/16 14:38), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Lukas Slebodnik lslebodn@redhat.com wrote:
On (03/06/16 09:38), Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:22:10AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
bump
obvious ACK, just waiting for the CI to finish.
It might be a good idea to enable some compiler warning to catch such issues.
Using manywarnings.m4 is something desirable, I guess. https://github.com/coreutils/gnulib/blob/master/m4/manywarnings.m4
By default is sssd build with following flags https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/sssd.git/tree/Makefile.am#n95
sssd can be also built with following extra flags ./configure CFLAGS="-Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare".
I would welcome any additional warnings. I didn't check which of warnings from manywarnings.m4 are enabled by default with Wextra or Wall but I know that some compiler warnings are not part of this "group" flags.
I am all five for enabling new warnigns.
+1
bye, Sumit
LS _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org