-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/24/2011 01:36 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 03/23/2011 04:11 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Jan Zelený <jzeleny(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 03/02/2011 10:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
>>>> I'm sending rebased patch by Pierre Ossman. The patch is adding an
>>>> option to allow/deny user access based on host attribute supported by
>>>> pam_ldap.
>>>>
>>>> I tested the patch and it works just fine. I also have no objections to
>>>> the design.
>>>>
>>>>
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/746
>>>
>>> Looks mostly OK to me and works. I have only some nitpicks:
>>>
>>> Can we use some other name than SYSDB_HOST? It seems too generic,
>>> perhaps SYSDB_AUTHORIZED_HOST? The same for SDAP_AT_HOST and name of
>>
>> the
>>
>>> config option (something like ldap_user_authorized_host?).
>>
>> Corrected patch in attachment
>>
>> Jan
> One other small correction on Jakub's request
> Jan
Thank you, Ack now :-)
Pushed to master.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk2LijIACgkQeiVVYja6o6MwAwCeO6u8b8APb90C7Taye7kHWpGO
OgwAn3Fjk03/f7bReobaoFduEKVC5kSj
=pGiX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----