Title: #200: Improve PAM test client
On (22/03/17 03:08), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
I'm fine with adding this form to master now and asking for
feedback in downstream as long as we agree that the functionality must be part of sssctl
before the next upstream release (similar arrangement as we have with the certmapping tool
I do no understand this; which feedback do you mean?
We can prepare version with sssctl; then get feedback from anyone
Update functionality based on feedback.
Is there any problem with such approach ?
IMHO it would be just confusing if we move it to sssctl subcomand later.
See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/200#issuecomment-288373471