On Feb 26, 2014, at 10:27 PM, Chris Murphy <lists(a)colorremedies.com> wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 9:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com>
wrote:
> I don't know if this has been fixed, no longer applies or just has been
> ignored by only using it on 64bit machines, but before we go making it
> a default and shipping it on 32bit, we should ask around about it. ;)
Sure, I agree. I will ask on the XFS list and also include armv7hl in the inquiry even
though I'm not certain they are interested in XFS (?).
http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2014-February/034588.html
i686 is regularly tested upstream, and there are no concerns about it being used by
default there. I'm a bit less certain about the arm response, so maybe solicit
feedback from them in case they have concerns about it?
Chris Murphy