Am Donnerstag, den 05.11.2009, 14:56 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 11:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm not sure I like the idea, if the idea is 'stop doing a small
> functional live image and make our smallest 'complete-out-of-the-box'
> image 2GB big'.
>
The biggest gap in terms of 'complete-out-of-the-box' is OpenOffice.
Including that brings us up to around 850M or so.
But isn't this just because of the 3 million language packages
provided ? Could the size kept small by providing uni-language or
language-group spins ?
Just a thought
Lars