On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org> wrote:
I agree with Paul, I don't think all of this needs to be finished
the alpha release, but I do think there needs to be some substantial
and testable implementation for the features we decide are blockers,
even if the results of those tests are "it's not working very well."
I propose that we revisit any issues that we agree are blockers, and
make our go/no-go decision at the last WG meeting before the alpha
freeze -- that is, two weeks from today -- based on the progress of any
hero development that occurs before then.
If we decide to go, then I propose we use the standard blocker bug
process to track unfinished blocker issues as automatic *beta* release
blockers using the standard blocker process, and simply delay F24 beta
until they are done. It's time to eliminate uncertainty and set clear
expectations early on for what we will be releasing. This will
incentivize developers to treat Wayland issues (such as the shrinking
gnome-terminal) more seriously.
El mié, 17-02-2016 a las 11:45 -0500, Paul W. Frields escribió:
> * Tablet support and protocols
> (I take it this is "~equivalent set to what we handle now in
-1 blocker, only a small minority of users need Wacom tablets, and they
can skip one release.
Why would they have to do that? The X session isn't going anywhere you
can just login into X.