On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:46 +0100, pbrobinson(a)gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi, folks. Just a question - since GNOME 3 is being delayed and won't
> > ship in F14, does it make sense to have a few apps (but not many) ported
> > to GTK+ 3 for F14? I can see it causing more trouble along the lines of
> > the gnome-python2-desktop package. Would it be better to move them back
> > to GTK+ 2 and postpone porting to GTK+ 3 until F15? What's the plan in
> > general for backing off from 2.90.x versions of GNOME bits? Thanks!
>
> With the disabling of gnome-python2-evince the sugar team has an issue
> with our sugar-read package which depends on it.
Yeah, I noticed that, but I didn't see any good option to avoid it; if
we don't rebuild g-p2-d and disable evince, it won't work *at all*,
since it'll still be built against py2.6 :/
I can cope in the short term. As long as its fixed eventually before release!
Peter