On 03/17/2010 09:26 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> The current DVD image is basically defined by comps and if you edit
> comps, you can control the result and since rel-eng does the compose,
> aren't they responsible for it? If not, how do we fix it? We cannot
> just ignore that experience. The desktop live image despite being the
> default doesn't cover a bunch of use cases (ability to select a
> different package set or even a different filesystem for example) and
> Mo's survey shows that the majority of users continue to download the
> DVD image and while taking the step of moving to a large image and
> offering a better out of box experience solves some of that, it doesn't
> make the proble go away.
>
> Alternatively, if noone is responsible for it, why are we still doing it?
>
Correction to above -- actually, direct download numbers I pull from
the HTTP logs show that the Desktop Live image far outnumber the DVD.
Mo's survey shows that the majority of respondents to her survey
continue to download the DVD image. :-)
Sorry but I don't see the correction. Aren't you agreeing with on Mo's
survey?
Rahul