drago01 (drago01(a)gmail.com) said:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Richard Hughes
<hughsient(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5 March 2013 20:02, Ryan Lerch <rlerch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Does this mean that the Application data will be something that Fedora will
>> need to host in addition to the data already in the packages?
>
> Depends if Fedora wants to have application icons and translated
> descriptions
I still don't understand the whole fuzz about that .. it can't be that
hard to ship a bunch of icons and text ...
Mainly that it becomes a pain in the ass to update, what do you do about
themed icons, and the logical silliness of a package that says:
License: GPL and LGPLv2 and LGPLv2+ and MPL and WTFPL and ASL2.0 and
GPLv3 and GPLv3+ and LGPLv3 and X11 and MIT and You'reAPepperToo
Bill