On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:03:47 -0500
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Kevin Fenzi (kevin(a)scrye.com) said:
> Another aspect of xfs we may want to investigate and get feedback
> from filesystem folks is how well xfs works on 32bit these days.
>
> RHEL7 doesn't have a 32bit version in their beta, so they only need
> to support 64bit xfs. Does the fact that we expect to have 32bit
> workstation and/or server weigh into this decision any?
We expect to have a 32-bit workstation or server?
Not trying to troll, but I don't know that any of these were
specifically discussed or specified in the products - are there any
arches where Fedora currently exists that we don't necessarily care
about having a particular product on? (For example, if you expand to
secondary arches, I'd question the idea of s390 Workstation.)
Bill, who does have a 32-bit x86 server under his home desk...
Yeah, I don't know. That would be a good thing to decide for:
a) each of the products.
b) fedora in general
c) spins
kevin