On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 08:33:37AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Naheem Zaffar
<naheemzaffar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> ESR will only delay the problem.
>
> Can the Fedora build add a secodary key to accept signed extensions?
This is one of the suggested solutions, but it is not currently
implemented upstream.
> AFAIK the long term plan is todeprecate the current method of extensions in
> favour of a more browser agnostic approach.
Correct.
Is it just me, or does it seem odd to take Mozilla to task for doing
something with their (relatively much larger) ecosystem we also
endeavor to do with Fedora's?
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com