Parameshwara Bhat wrote:
Dear List,
I am a curious member of this list and an ordinary user of Linux ; so
excuse me for breaking into a learned debate.I want to give a
perspective of my end,following the threads between Havoc, Matthew
and David.
I use Fedora at home and office. Nowhere I can have the support of
learned linux experts at my beck and call; Also, I have installed the
OS and created root and other users. All passwords are available with
me.Working as a user,by the number of times I have to invoke 'root',I
wonder why I should not be working as root itself ?.
By the discussions I have seen here and elsewhere, it appears most
linux experts and creators are basically contemptous of such a user
as me. I am sane, responsible and intelligent, but just not a linux
expert. I have my job and I want computer to be an unhindering aid
and a provider of entertainment.Why should I be required to know the
intricacies of the OS ? When the CD is locked and unmountable,
unejectable; profound sermons on the security aspects of linux hardly
makes sense.
While completely respecting the concerns of security and stability;
borderlines of zones and the security matrix can always be redefined
and redesigned if you know exactly what you want to give the end
user.OS and programs like shirts and pants need to be tailored to users.
I am a devoted user of Linux and Fedora. But what a stupid it makes of
me! Without the root password I just cannot imagine keeping this box
running and making any use of it.In a regulated office
environment(unlike mine)where I wouldn't be having the root password,
I do not think I will be able to use it with any amount of ease.In
contrast, much maligned Windows pampers me!So nice and considerate of
my needs with all it's flaws and weaknesses.Without the root password
and a great deal of 'googli'ng and 'maillist'ng, I couldnot have
sustained Linux on this box. Again,compare this with Windows.
When will Linux and Fedora learn to respect me and users like me or
will it at all? Answer to that will be the key to whether it can
really compete with MS
Parameshwara Bhat
Parameshwara,
The reason why root access is necessary is that it prevents any
accidental damage to your system. Of course it is ok for you to have
root access to your own Fedora Core installation - after all, you are
administering it.
Your point about the regulated office environment pretty much answers
your question. For instance, at my place of work we all use Windows 2000
or Mac OS X. I'm one of the people on Windows 2000. Our IT Services
department have an acceptable use policy that is supposed to restrict me
from installing third party software or anything malicious. However,
with Windows 2000 they have all the users set up with administration
rights over their own machine, so in theory I could download iTunes and
any other piece of software, install it and let it play havoc with my
system. Work computers are for work - it is as simple as that. I have
seen many laptops and desktops having to be fixed or having to have
spyware removed because some user has downloaded and installed software
that they shouldn't have done.
However, I have FC3 on my home computer which I trash most weeks just
because I can. New software is downloaded and used all the time...
sometimes it breaks, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes no
difference at all. The point is that I am responsible for my home
machine. I am also responsible for my work machine - I have to use it
day by day in order to carry out my duties. If it breaks I am not
productive...
Fedora does respect users - the System Administrators can grant
differing levels of access to the system to particular users. I don't
think it is as much about system security as it is about system integrity.
But that is just my two pence worth,
Andy