On Mon, 23.08.10 06:28, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johannbg(a)gmail.com) wrote:
On 08/21/2010 09:02 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Well, I believe Fedora should not do this by default. This just adds
>> > complexity, makes boot slower, and offers exactly zero advantages for
>> > laptop/desktop users. Also, sooner or later LVM will be obsoleted anyway
>> > by btrfs which integrates most of the LVM features into the fs
>> > itself. And in contrast to LVM the btrfs userspace is kinda nice.
>> >
> I've got no issues with not doing LVM by default here...
Is this then just a matter of go ahead and make the change?
I think many people would welcome if this step was done, but this
is probably something to discuss with the anaconda people directly? I am
pretty sure tehy won't read our little desktop ML. :-(
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.