Perhaps he is referring to vector icons, where upscaling does not have
such a destructive effect as bitmaps
On Wed, 20 Aug, 2014 at 8:45 PM, drago01 <drago01(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Richard Hughes
> On 20 August 2014 18:45, drago01 <drago01(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> 64x64 is too small for high dpi screens (its the same as 32x32 for
>> hidpi screen) if "64x64" is your aim ask for 128x128.
> That would push the icon tarball from 6Mb to over 25Mb.
Why is this a problem?
> I'm happy
> doing both sizes for hidpi, but I think an easier fix is just to
> the icons double size in the hidpi case in the client.
Sure can do that but they do look worse this way.
desktop mailing list