On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 18:42:10 +0200,
Martin Sourada <martin.sourada(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 11:12 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 17:26:29 +0200,
> Martin Sourada <martin.sourada(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > It would help to list which spins went oversize and what's their target
> > size. So general info:
>
> broffice and xfce are the two that went over their targets. They need to
> get back under 703 MiB. Games was almost hit, but still has enough cushion
> that I can handle the hedgewars small increase in size which will be
> showing up in a push tomorrow unless it gets negative karma before then.
> But I'm still pretty close and will probably still implement whatever
> we do for broffice and xfce.
>
AFAIK XFCE should require only -single, unless they pull
gnome-desktop(3) for some reason. That grew by 1MB, probably due to
increased complexity of the wallpaper. I'd investigate this one more
throughout if I were you.
That will be lower priority for me. Kevin knows that package better and
the solution there doesn't help broffice, whereas working on a general
solution will help xfce in the short run, even if there is also another
problem that can be fixed.