On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 14:17 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:10:35 -0400
Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm not against it. The complaint will be that people will just get
> failures and not have anything to show them why. Maybe we can get the
> quick change into the default firewall rules so that they'll log
> failures so that it's not at least entirely silent
+10, that's the most annoying thing to me about our default rules.
It's so silent. If we're afraid of it drowning out /var/log/messages
we could send it to a firewall log file. But I'm all for dropping
these from Firstboot and going with our defaults.
Anybody for firewall2allow? (:
Maybe Lennart can fix it too? :)
Here's an old entry in my bookmarks:
This probably needs UI love, and use of D-Bus instead of Unix sockets
for the admin rights, but the idea is there.