On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 14:25 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
Will/should there be separate or slightly more qualified requirements for i686? Either
hardware 3D support, or an age bracket?
I ask because I dug out a 10 year old Dell laptop from storage and it meets the current
requirements: 2GB RAM, 60GB drive, 1.7GHz CPU.
But with AMD RV250/M9 GL FireGL 9000/Radeon 9000, the journal reports:
gnome-session-is-accelerated: No hardware 3D support.
This is because of a blacklist
in /usr/share/gnome-session/hardware-compatibility - I don't remember at
this point why pre-R300 Radeon is blacklisted... as far as I know things
*should* work. Theories:
* old Radeons typically have very small amounts of on-board video
memory - 64MB is practically speaking pretty much the minimum that is
going to work well.
* Even several years ago when we created that file, we didn't feel like
we had enough testing on R[12]xx to have any confidence in the drivers.
* Some bug encountered in the past that may or may not have been fixed.
* AGP, ugh, don't want to deal.
You can try commenting out the relevant line in that file and see what
happens.
While gdm comes up, gnome-shell crashes (this is TC6).
This is definitely not expected; since hardware support is disabled, you
will have llmvpipe rendering, just like is used, e.g., when running
Fedora in a VM. (i686 Fedora in a VM seems to work just fine.)
With my QA hat on, I'd say if it worked, I'd use it against
some of the
test cases; the fact it doesn't and i686 is (probably?) going away soon
anyway makes me think "if it works, bonus; if it doesn't, give up while
you still can" sort of attitude.
Our current thinking is that this system is marginal, but within the
system requirements and any crashes are bugs we should fix.
- Owen