dragoran wrote:
Kevin Verma wrote:
> dragoran wrote:
>> Anuj Verma (Kevin) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:22:10 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Fedora doesn't have a 32 bit package for compatibility; it's only
>>>> there
>>>> because of the way multilib works. If so many apps didn't rely on
>>>> it to
>>>> build against, there would be only a 64 bit version.
>>>>
>>>
>>> but there is a firefox.i386
>>>
>> yes because packages needs it to build against it. (every package
>> that has a -devel package has a i386 and a x86_64 version)
>>>> Now that nspluginwrapper is in rawhide though, it should be working
>>>> no?
>>>> File a bug if not.
>>>>
>>>
>>> yes i noticed that "nspluginwrapper" is there but it is not working
>>> right for sure. I hope to bug report it soon.
>>>
>> works fine here also we have a 64bit java plugin in rawhide (I am
>> using blackdown java on my x86_64 f7 box)
>>
> I tried both IcedTea and Black down 64bit plugin those work, but the
> flash-plugin is not working at all under nspluginwrapper
>
working fine here... no crashes or anything does not notice anything
different then without nspluginwrapper...
is it listed under about:plugins ?
Hello,
Thanks for offering your help, I was too nick of time to test this issue
previously. All the time in about:plugins flash plugin was listed as
unknown plugin "do not open"
However with today's nspluginwrapper & firefox updates, I looked into
this issue further and I found that perhaps an old stale file
"npwrapper.libflashplayer.so" was causing the issue, I simply removed
the same and re-installed flash-plugin & nspluginwrapper packages with yum.
Not really running after major bugs this season, lot too many folks have
their eyes on it :-)
Cheers,
Kevin