Yes, you're right, ignore what I said and just leave it as a note that
I18N is still a future. And I'm glad to hear you like the proposed changes!
On 12/6/2012 12:59 PM, Romain Pelisse wrote:
Why on earth i18n would require a GUI ??? I'm not shooting at you, I
just don't follow you train of thought.
Removing the GUI installer is a great leap forward and should not be
compromised, especially for i18n purposes. Given the very technical
nature of RHQ, I seriously doubt this is a "killing features"...
> Le 6 déc. 2012 16:33, "Jay Shaughnessy" <jshaughn(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:jshaughn@redhat.com>> a écrit :
>
>
> I guess the remaining issue with this approach would be any required
> I18N. Scripts and prop files are pretty much English-only. It would
> seem a GUI installer would be required at some point to offer I18N.
>
>
>
> On 12/5/2012 9:26 AM, John Mazzitelli wrote:
> >>
> >> - Why would someone install into an existing AS...
>
_______________________________________________
rhq-users mailing list
rhq-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-users