Yes, you're right, ignore what I said and just leave it as a note that I18N is still a future.  And I'm glad to hear you like the proposed changes!


On 12/6/2012 12:59 PM, Romain Pelisse wrote:

Why on earth i18n would require a GUI ??? I'm not shooting at you, I just don't follow you train of thought.

Removing the GUI installer is a great leap forward and should not be compromised, especially for i18n purposes. Given the very technical nature of RHQ, I seriously doubt this is a "killing features"...

Le 6 déc. 2012 16:33, "Jay Shaughnessy" <jshaughn@redhat.com> a écrit :


I guess the remaining issue with this approach would be any required I18N.  Scripts and prop files are pretty much English-only.  It would seem a GUI installer would be required at some point to offer I18N.



On 12/5/2012 9:26 AM, John Mazzitelli wrote:
>>
>> - Why would someone install into an existing AS...



_______________________________________________
rhq-users mailing list
rhq-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-users