I found out (got sidetracked for a while) that the solution to this
problem is
=================================================================
- I added "-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=19988
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false" to the JPPF server's
jvm options (this is the property "jppf.jvm.options" in the
jppf-driver.properties configuration file)
- by default, in the discovery queue of RHQ, the JPPF server was
filtered out as "ignored", so I had to select "New and Ignored" for
the
"Show" dropdown, and I could then see my JPPF server JVM and import it
============================================
Thanks to "lolo" on the JPPF list for giving me this information
On 5/13/2011 1:06 PM, Ian Springer wrote:
Does the RHQ Agent discover a JMX Server Resource corresponding to
JPPF
java process or is not even discovered? If it's not discovered, check
that the PPPF process looks like in the process table. If it looks like
"java ...", it should get discovered by the jmx plugin. If not you might
need to turn on DEBUG logging on the Agent or connect to it with a JPDA
debugger to figure out why it's not getting discovered.
Once it is discovered, you'll need to import it into inventory and then
you may potentially need to edit some of the Resource's connection
properties under its Inventory tab.
On 05/13/2011 09:17 AM, John Holland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a project that is using JPPF to do some intensive
> processing. I found that JPPF is a JMX server under the hood
> and I would like to connect it to JON (or RHQ). I'm not having any luck
> with this. I followed some instructions to connect Eclipse as a JMX server
> and had no problems with that. In that case I was using the Java 5
> template for a JMX server and editing the URL. The JPPF conf files give
> properties and default values
> for JMX and RMI ports and host to connect to but JON does not report
> that a connection has been made.
>
> If anyone has any experience with this and can give me any clues that
> would be great.
>
>
> Thanks,
> John
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-users mailing list
> rhq-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-users