ppc April 2017

ppc@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
3 discussions

ppc64le: c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
by Sérgio Basto 10 Mar '19

10 Mar '19

Hello ppc list , I don't know where I should report this issue, if this is not the correct place, please tell me where it is, thanks. I can't build opencv-3.1 on ppc64le the builds always ends with : {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:36678: Warning: end of file not at end of a line; newline inserted {standard input}:39048: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.l295' {standard input}: Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus) Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> for instructions. make[2]: *** [modules/cvv/CMakeFiles/opencv_cvv.dir/src/view/rawview.cpp.o] Error 4 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Build logs: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/opencv/build/183181/ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/opencv/fedora- 23-ppc64le/00183181-opencv/build.log.gz https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/opencv/fedora- rawhide-ppc64le/00181899-opencv/build.log.gz Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B.

4 7

test matrices for F-26 release testing
by Dan Horák 13 Apr '17

13 Apr '17

Hi, Eric and Guy created again the test matrices for the F-26 release testing at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_26_PowerPC_Test_Results which links to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/PowerPC/Fedora_26_PowerPC_inst… https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/PowerPC/Fedora_26_PowerPC_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/PowerPC/Fedora_26_PowerPC_Serv… https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/PowerPC/Fedora_26_PowerPC_Cloud Thanks to OpenQA they are being filled with results, but don't hesitate to add your testing results too, thanks in advance :-) With regards Dan

1 0

Future direction for Fedora on Power
by Dan Horák 04 Apr '17

04 Apr '17

Hello friends of the PowerPC and Power architectures, As you likely know our Fedora on Power project is driven by a small team of Red Hat and IBM employees with occasional collaboration from the broader community. And we have to think about our priorities when our resources are limited. Currently we care about 2 architectures, ppc64 and ppc64le, they are both using the same ISA, but yet different ABIs. The facts about the current situation and an outlook into the future is - IBM is focusing on the ppc64le variant in all new Linux developments [1] - all new hardware (Power or OpenPower based) is capable of running in little endian mode We can look at Golang as an example where the ppc64 port is not on-par with the ppc64le one in features (it lacks some). This can lead to a situation where we will have to drop ppc64 from the supported Golang architectures and make ppc64 Fedora port less complete. We expect similar situation with other projects where there is no sustained effort to support ppc64. As a result we want to transfer the ppc64 port into a maintenance mode. It means new features, that we plan for ppc64le, won't be enabled for ppc64 (eg. Atomic Host compose) or it may even lose some features in the time (eg. disable the whole golang-* stack). There is currently no plan to remove ppc64 as a Fedora architecture under the community control, it will only receive less attention than ppc64le. With regards Dan on behalf of the Fedora on Power team [1] https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/fe313521-2e95-46f2-817d-…

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

ppc April 2017