New PowerPC MacMini online and waiting to become a Builder
by Bertrand Juglas
Hello,
I've put online my PowerPC MacMini running Fedora 12.
It's waiting at tv.juglas.name for SSH connections authorized by public keys.
So i would like to make it become a Builder of the PowerPC secondary
architecture koji installed by Josh Boyer.
Can you explain me what I have to do to make this server become a Builder ?
Thank you in advance,
Bertrand
13 years, 5 months
Re: Fedora-ppc Digest, Vol 69, Issue 4
by Robert Hagan
hi.. I am new to Fedora-ppc but I do think that there should be at
least a 13.. Really it is important for us all to have some self
respect and move forward. Although I travel too much but can arrange
a ppc unit (PowerStation) or maybe two to support this effort. I am
a firm believer in integrity and would like to support those who also
have self respect.
Please let me know how I can help. Best wishes to all, Robert.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:00 PM, <fedora-ppc-request(a)lists.infradead.org> wrote:
> Send Fedora-ppc mailing list submissions to
> fedora-ppc(a)lists.infradead.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ppc
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-ppc-request(a)lists.infradead.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-ppc-owner(a)lists.infradead.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Fedora-ppc digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Fedora-ppc Digest, Vol 69, Issue 1 (Dan Hor?k)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:05:04 +0200
> From: Dan Hor?k <dan(a)danny.cz>
> To: fedora-ppc(a)lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: Fedora-ppc Digest, Vol 69, Issue 1
> Message-ID: <1276031104.2408.47.camel(a)eagle.danny.cz>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> David Woodhouse p??e v ?t 08. 06. 2010 v 13:52 +0100:
>> On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 14:09 +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > thus Josh Boyer spake:
>> > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:47:33AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> > >> On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 13:39 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > >>> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 08:17:23PM +0300, Robert Hagan wrote:
>> > >>>> As somewhat of a novice at both Fedora and powerpc, does anyone have
>> > >>>> news on when we may expect Fedora13 for powerpc to be available?
>> > >>> There is no ETA for Fedora 13 ppc/ppc64.
>> > >> I took a quick look at this. I was _hoping_ that it would be a simple
>> > >> case of doing a compose... but there are actually quite a lot of build
>> > >> failures.
>> > >
>> > > Yes, they have grown over the past couple of months. I tried reporting build
>> > > failures in bugzilla with limited success and I don't have time to fix them
>> > > all at the moment.
>> > >
>> > >> Is there any tool to make sense of these and find the original failure
>> > >>from which the others cascade, and to resubmit the dependent failures?
>> > >
>> > > No. Other than the output from koji-shadow, which isn't really accessible or
>> > > easy to read over.
>> > >
>> > >> Is there a generic "Fedora secondary arches" mailing list where such
>> > >> things should be discussed?
>> > >
>> > > secondary(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > >
>> > >> Let's pick the gcc-4.4.4-5.fc13 build failure as the first one to
>> > >> investigate.... it failed in deps due to not finding /usr/lib64/libc.so.
>> > >>
>> > >> Is this because the glibc64 package isn't tagged in
>> > >> SHADOWBUILD-dist-f13-build? Perhaps because Jakub never did a build of
>> > >> glibc64 for F-13? Can we remedy that?
>> > >
>> > > This is because koji-shadow is dumb and didn't bring in the glibc64 package.
>> > > It will likely work if submitted by hand.
>> > >
>> > >> Can we get the build repositories rsynced onto bombadil so that we can
>> > >> use mock manually there?
>> > >
>> > > The repos for the tags? Not sure. My bandwidth is the limiting factor for
>> > > most of this and I'm hoping to get new hardware placed into the PXH2 datacenter
>> > > in not horribly long.
>>
>> How much bandwidth does it take to upload the built packages? Surely you
>> can't build them faster than you can upload them? :)
>>
>> How much CPU power do you have there, anyway?
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm interested in this port (as well as I'm interested in a CentOS
>> > PowerPC port), but I don't have too much spare time left to be able to
>> > do some work here.
>> >
>> > However, I do have some hardware (both an IBM Power 285 and 275) as well
>> > as internet connectivity to give, as long as it is within an acceptable
>> > scale (I work for an ISP and have some colo space).
>> >
>> > So, if I can be of any help hosting stuff on x86 machines, please tell
>> > me. I could furthermore set up one of the Power machines, however it'd
>> > surely take some time.
>>
>> The issue is getting the build horsepower and the hosting in the same
>> place, I think. I'm not sure if those two boxes would suffice to do the
>> work that jwb's cluster is doing... but if so, perhaps we could cope if
>> you were to just do a basic install to each of them and connect them.
>
> from my experience in Fedora/s390x most bandwidth is needed for the hub,
> the builders (or a group of builders) can use a cache and be in a
> different location, it works quite well for us
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-ppc mailing list
> Fedora-ppc(a)lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ppc
>
>
> End of Fedora-ppc Digest, Vol 69, Issue 4
> *****************************************
>
--
Robert J. Hagan
HaganRJ(a)State.gov
Mil: robert.hagan(a)iraq.centcom.mil
DSN: 318-864 0703, COM: +1 240-553-9212
mobile: AsiaCell: +976 07808499797, +1 401 219 1213
GvSMS: +1 502 286 9775
SIPR-only: Robert.Hagan(a)s-iraq.centcom.smil.mil
13 years, 5 months
Re: Fedora-ppc Digest, Vol 69, Issue 1
by Robert Hagan
As somewhat of a novice at both Fedora and powerpc, does anyone have
news on when we may expect Fedora13 for powerpc to be available?
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:00 PM, <fedora-ppc-request(a)lists.infradead.org> wrote:
> Send Fedora-ppc mailing list submissions to
> fedora-ppc(a)lists.infradead.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ppc
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-ppc-request(a)lists.infradead.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-ppc-owner(a)lists.infradead.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Fedora-ppc digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Tic, M. Sainte-Beuve, and a very inadequate estimate it in my
> jud (Amstein Lovier)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:50:41 +0200
> From: Amstein Lovier <evaluable(a)fumes.tv>
> To: Andreatta Leclere <fedora-ppc(a)lists.infradead.org>
> Subject: Tic, M. Sainte-Beuve, and a very inadequate estimate it in my
> jud
> Message-ID: <4C097484.6010809(a)fumes.tv>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/octet-stream
> Size: 1318 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/fedora-ppc/attachments/20100604/0655...>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-ppc mailing list
> Fedora-ppc(a)lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ppc
>
>
> End of Fedora-ppc Digest, Vol 69, Issue 1
> *****************************************
>
--
Robert J. Hagan
HaganRJ(a)State.gov
Mil: robert.hagan(a)iraq.centcom.mil
DSN: 318-864 0703, COM: +1 240-553-9212
mobile: AsiaCell: +976 07808499797, +1 401 219 1213
GvSMS: +1 502 286 9775
SIPR-only: Robert.Hagan(a)s-iraq.centcom.smil.mil
13 years, 5 months
Tic, M. Sainte-Beuve, and a very inadequate estimate it in my jud
by Amstein Lovier
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\*\generator Msftedit 0.48.39.5059;}{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Calibri;}}
{\*\generator Msftedit 0.48.39.5059;}{\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue255;\red192\green80\blue77;\red0\green176\blue80;\red204\green180\blue0;\red255\green0\blue0;\red223\green206\blue4;\red155\green0\blue211;\red79\green129\blue189;\red165\green165\blue165;\red128\green158\blue194;\red247\green150\blue70;\red0\green77\blue187;\red75\green172\blue198;\red221\green132\blue132;\red51\green51\blue51;\red158\green124\blue124;\red155\green187\blue89;}
{\*\generator Msftedit 0.48.39.5059;}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\sa200\sl276\slmult1\lang9\f0\fs32{\field{\*\fldinst{HYPERLINK "h{\*\dd 0.48.39.5059;}ttp://www.tu22.ru"}}{\fldrslt{\ul\cf1 http://www.tu22.ru}}}\f0\cf1\b\fs32 - Order the cheapest medications now!\par
Viagra \cf4 Cialis \cf3 Viagra Professional \cf5 Cialis Professional \cf6 Viagra Super Active+ \cf3 Cialis Super Active+ \cf7 Levitra\cf0 \cf8 Viagra Soft Tabs \cf9 Cialis Soft Tabs\cf10 \cf11 Levitra Professional \cf4 Female Viagra \cf12 Propecia \cf7 Acomplia \cf6 Xenical\cf0 \cf5 Brand Levitra \cf13 Female Cialis \cf14 Levitra Super Active+ \cf15 Tamiflu\cf0 \cf7 VPXL\cf0 \cf16 Viagra Soft Flavoured \cf5 Brand Viagra \cf17 Brand Cialis\cf0
{\*\generator Msftedit 0.48.39.5059;}}
13 years, 6 months